US sides with same-sex couples in Utah


Megan, left, and Candace Berrett, right, hold their daughter Quinn as they speak to supporters of gay marriage during a rally at the Utah State Capitol Friday, Jan. 10, 2014 in Salt Lake City. Supporters of gay marriage filled the rotunda for a rally and to deliver a petition with over 58,000 signatures in support of gay marriage to Utah Governor Gary Herbert. AP

SALT LAKE CITY — Gay couples in Utah have experienced a helter-skelter wave of emotions over the last three weeks: They were suddenly allowed to marry, then saw the weddings stopped by the U.S. Supreme Court and were told the state wouldn’t recognize the unions.

Now, the federal government has intervened and said it will recognize their weddings.

The announcement Friday by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the government will honor gay marriage in Utah marked the latest strong show of support for same-sex weddings from the Obama administration. The action means that more than 1,000 same-sex couples who were married in Utah in the last month can file federal taxes jointly, get Social Security benefits for spouses and request legal immigration status for partners, among other benefits.

Gay couples rejoiced over the news.

Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson were the first gay couple to legally marry in Utah, and they were thrilled at the thought of having the same federal benefits as straight couples. They plan to file their taxes jointly because of the change.

“Our apartment burst into celebratory anthems of Cher and Beyoncé,” said Anderson about his reaction to Holder’s statement. “It is a great feeling to know the federal government stands with us, especially in a state that has for years tried to exclude us.”

A federal judge overturned Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage on Dec. 20, and hundreds of couples got married in one of the most conservative U.S. states where more than 60 percent of the population are Mormons. The U.S. Supreme Court put a halt to the weddings until the courts sort out the matter. Utah then declared it would not recognize the weddings, but would allow couples to continue to receive whatever benefits they had obtained before the high court ruling.

Utah leaders reiterated on Friday that the state would not recognize same-sex weddings, meaning couples can receive federal benefits but are limited at the state level. The Mormon church, which has its world headquarters in Salt Lake City, weighed in again Friday, instructing local leaders that same-sex wedding ceremonies and receptions are prohibited in its temples and reiterating its belief that homosexuality is not condoned by God.

But for same-sex couples who have experienced a wave of emotions, the show of support from the federal government turned a rally at the Utah state capitol into a raucous celebration.

People held signs that read, “Two moms make a right,” ”Love is love” and “Marriage is a human right — not a heterosexual privilege” and “We are Family” played through loudspeakers.

Laura Fields, who retired from the Air Force in 2006, said her new wife can now get a military identification card that will allow her to take advantage of benefits offered military spouses, such as health coverage and access to commissaries and exchanges on a nearby base to buy food and household items at a discount.

Until now, Fields said she has had to carry an extra insurance policy to cover her partner of five years. They live in a small city outside Hill Air Force Base in northern Utah and married on Christmas Eve.

“It has a real effect,” Fields said. “Legal limbo hurts.”

President Barack Obama welcomed Holder’s decision, said White House spokesman Jay Carney. He said he didn’t know whether Obama specifically discussed the issue with Holder before the decision, but added the president has publicly expressed his support for same-sex marriage and equal rights for all Americans. Obama declared his support of gay marriage in May 2012.

Holder’s decision came days after Utah officials said they would not recognize the marriages. The office of Gov. Gary Herbert told state agencies this week to put a freeze on proceeding with any new benefits for the newly married gay and lesbian couples until the courts resolve the issue.

The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will consider the long-term question of whether gay couples have a right to marry in Utah. The state’s voters approved the ban in 2004.

On Friday, the Mormon church issued another statement that explained its beliefs on gay marriage.

“Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established,” the statement said. “God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society. His law of chastity is clear: sexual relations are proper only between a man and a woman who are legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife.”


Judge lets Utah gay marriages continue

Utah turns to higher court to halt gay marriage

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • wawa2172

    Its Sodom and Gomorrah in the US. Same sex marriage should not have been tolerated in the most powerful country on earth dahil marami ang gagaya nito, Though its farfetched to happen in a religiously conservative Philippines (thus thanks I am a cathoilic) some would attempt to try this. A number of Filipinos have been married to same sex in the US. I don’t want to be judgmental but it see it to be very wrong. I would be funny if the President and Vice President of the US decide to be tied together in same sex marriage after divorcing their wives..ewwww!

  • bonobojean

    anyone who says they know what god wants has no idea what god wants…

  • lapasan

    In my opinion the purpose of marriage is to have a union of two persons who love each other to live together to pursue happiness or at times sadness. Marriage is also an institution for them to have offspring. How can same sex couple ever have children? Same sex marriage is against the law of nature and the law of God. I am a sinner and I am in no position to cast judgment of other people’s sinfulness or righteousness. But I think same sex marriage is not in line with an appropriate human decency.

  • Kenjie Hasaki

    That is good news. It is good to know that the US government uphold your rights and advance equality…

    • Guest

      Romans 1:18-32, Galatians 1:12
      Matthew 5:17-20 [Christ speaks]

      • Kenjie Hasaki

        What about those verses…

  • Mux

    Homosexuals should not force the world to accept their practices. They are in the minority and I think it is arrogant of them to impose their will on us. Instead, they should work with Heterosexuals and find ways and means to rid themselves of this affliction.

  • Kenjie Hasaki

    We will only have true freedom when people respect a person’s individual choices and that the State guards that choices.

    Those against same-sex marriage have always have a choice not to have one. No one is forcing them. The State is not forcing anyone or the church or any religion to officiate a same sex weeding. So I don’t get why people would want to meddle in the lives and love of anyone..

    No one has the right to look into the window of one man’s soul – QE1.

  • Kenjie Hasaki

    The purpose of life is to obtain happiness… to have equal rights before law and to have freedom to love just like everybody else.

    They say: [Marriage is an institution to have offspring.]

    Are we saying that couples who are not able to bear children fails the institution of marriage or that marriage fails them?

    Clearly, having children is not the ultimate purpose in marriage. The Purpose of marriage is for two people to share love and happiness while they are on their journey on this earth together.

    They say: [Same sex marriage is against the law of nature and the law of God.]

    For sure it is not against nature. Gays are born the way they are. It is their nature. Who would want to choose to be gay and be bashed and discriminated. I believe that to go against their nature, is the greatest folly of all.

    Being gay or straight is like a color of one’s skin. No one can change it (save may be Michael Jackson).

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos