Palace: Marcos clothes have no historic value


Branded high heel shoes, once worn by flamboyant former first lady Imelda Marcos, sit among equally-damaged shoes and bags in a section of the National Museum in Manila. AP

MANILA, Philippines—A Malacañang official has said that a legendary collection of shoes and other possessions left behind by former first lady Imelda Marcos and her dictator husband when they were ousted by a 1986 “people power” revolt have no historical significance, except for some gowns.

Communications Undersecretary Manolo Quezon issued the statement after National Museum officials acknowledged that the collection of Marcos’ clothes and shoes had been neglected for more than two decades and some had been damaged by a monsoon storm last month.

Museum officials told The Associated Press on Sunday that termites, storms and neglect damaged part of Mrs. Marcos’ collection of at least 1,220 pairs of shoes and other items while they were stored from 1986 to 2010 at the Malacañan Palace and later at the National Museum in Manila.

More than 150 cartons of clothes, dress accessories and shoes were transferred to the National Museum for safekeeping two years ago from the riverside palace. They deteriorated further at the museum after the boxes were stored in a padlocked room that was inundated by heavy rains last month because of a leak in the ceiling, museum officials said.

Quezon said the contents of the boxes have “no historical significance except some of the clothes” made by prominent Filipino couturiers. Museum officials said the Philippine ternos might be displayed in public, but they were wary because of the “politically sensitive nature of their provenance.”

A Filipino historian, Michael Xiao Chua, said the Marcos items are important and should have been displayed to remind current and future generations of Marcos’ dictatorial rule and encourage them to safeguard the country’s democracy.

The damaged items include native see-through barong shirts, which Marcos often wore in public ceremonies during his 20-year rule. AP journalists saw a barong shirt with a presidential seal on top of a box of 100 shirts which had reddish stains and a sleeve that was nearly torn off.

The Marcoses fled the Philippines at the climax of an army-backed “people power” revolt which became a harbinger of change in authoritarian regimes worldwide. Mr. Marcos died in exile in Hawaii in 1989 and his widow and children returned home years later.

They left staggering amounts of personal belongings, clothes and art objects at the palace, including Imelda Marcos’ shoes which have come to symbolize her extravagance amid crushing poverty in the Southeast Asian country.

Ferdinand Marcos’ successor, democracy icon Corazon Aquino, accused him of stealing billions of dollars during his rule and ordered many of his assets seized.

Aquino had Imelda Marcos’ shoes displayed at the presidential palace. They were removed from public view and stored in the palace basement when Aquino stepped down in 1992. About 800 pairs were loaned in 2001 to a shoe museum which has since become a tourist attraction.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • actsfdapstle

    I agree… these items really has no historical values… so, why keep those stuffs for the Marcoses for almost three decades?  These things should be returned and let them safe keep their belongings.  Imaging how much the government has spend for almost three decades in space and security?   tsk tsk tsk… 

  • RyanE

    Auction off those items and use the proceeds to finance scholarships for out-of-school youth.

  • my_chatmate

    No appreciation of history. If we auction it off many would be interested for a piece of our history. Taj Majal once a symbol of extravagance and abuse of power that cause a downfall of a king. What’s the value now? 

  • Juan

    Wala namang alam sa history ‘yan eh…kaya hindi ma appreciate ang kahalagahan ng mga bagay na m historical value.

  • Vertumnus

    They are just shoes!  Should have been sold or given away a long, long time ago!
    Filipino tribal arts belong in a museum, old, stinky shoes belongs in the garbage.
    Way too much hoopla over nothing.

  • Nic Legaspi

    Sayang. These should have been auctioned off. To the government, these items may not hold value, but for others, it does. Just look at that Marikina museum that features Imelda’s shoes.

  • seaglass2401belle

    should be sold..and the monies to benefit the poor.T H E P O O R..not for any departmental expenditures or safekeeping

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94