Quantcast

Inner Awareness

Skeptics make fun of paranormal phenomena

By |


I bought two books from the same book store in Makati last week. One was “Paranormality (Why We Believe the Impossible),” by professor Richard Wiseman, and the other was “Handbook to the Afterlife,” by Pamela Rae Heath and Jon Klimo.

These two books are striking because the authors hold completely opposite views about paranormal phenomena, spiritism, and extra-sensory perception. The first book debunks everything involving paranormal experiences, whereas the second records case after case of their reality as reported and documented by investigators in the last 200 years.

Whereas Wiseman  regards all reported paranormal events, such as astral projection or out-of-body experiences, psychic powers of animals, telepathy, telekinesis, spirit communication, etc. as mere hallucination, trickery, deception or faulty research procedures, Pamela Heath and Jon Klimo, on the other hand, present a more objective and scholarly discussion of these topics supported by numerous references and bibliography.

The following is a typical example of the way Wiseman presents his arguments:

“Sue Blackmore’s interest in the paranormal dates back to 1970 when she was a student at Oxford University and had dramatic out-of-body experiences…

“Upon her return to reality, Sue became fascinated with weird experiences, trained as a white witch and eventually decided to devote herself to parapsychology. She was awarded a doctorate for work examining whether children have telepathic powers (they didn’t), went on several LSD trips to see if they would improve their psychic ability (they didn’t), and learned to read the Tarot to discover if the cards could predict the future (they didn’t).

“After 25 years of such disappointing results, Sue finally gave up the ghost and became a skeptic.”

Blackmore, according to the author, found no evidence of telepathy among a group of twins, contrary to common belief, and considers out-of-body experience an illusion produced by sensory deprivation. Other investigators say they are a result of “lack of oxygen in the brain.”

Trickery or fraud

Likewise, the author dismisses spirit rappings and knocks as plain trickery or fraud. And he based his conclusion on the dubious confession of Margaret Fox, who was one of three sisters in Hydesville, New York, who discovered spirit communication in 1848. She said such rappings were a trick they played on people for fun. Although Margaret eventually recanted her confession, skeptics have used that “to prove” that spiritism is merely hogwash.

The whole book of Wiseman tried to make fun of believers of paranormal phenomena as intellectually naive and credulous individuals, but never bothered to examine the volumes of scientific research about such phenomena.

In contrast, Pamela Heath and Jon Klimo do not claim to prove such phenomena exist but merely summarized centuries of published reports in support of the occurrence of psychic powers and spirit communication. They let the readers decide for themselves whether to believe their findings or not.

As Jon Klimo said: “There are many other perspectives besides the mainstream scientific one.” And I may add that some scientists are beginning to take a second look at the extraordinary claims of mystics and paranormal researchers in the light of the amazing discoveries in quantum physics.

For those who have not experienced any of the so-called psychic and paranormal phenomena, it is perfectly understandable that they would not believe in them. I myself started out as a complete skeptic. It took many years of research and only after experiencing some of these phenomena myself, like telepathy, telekinesis, astral projection, prophetic dreams, psychic diagnosis, fire walking, spirit communication, and many more, did I begin to believe in their reality. I do not base this conclusion on belief, but on numerous personal experiences which have been verified or witnessed by other people.

There is something in common that I have observed among these who are skeptical and nonbelievers of paranormal, psychic and spiritual phenomena. They all begin with the conclusion that if something cannot be explained scientifically, it does not exist. If it seems to exist, it must surely be a product of trickery, imagination or faulty research methodology.

On the other hand, those investigators who are open-minded about such phenomena begin with a sense of wonder and do not make hasty conclusions about them. They allow the evidence to speak for themselves and do not limit themselves to opinions of mainstream scientists.

As Shakespeare wisely put it: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

Join the next Basic ESP and Intuition Development Seminar on Dec. 8-9, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.; and Soulmates, Karma and Reincarnation seminar on Dec. 15, 1-7 p.m., at Rm. 308 Prince Plaza I, Legaspi St. Greenbelt, Makati. For seminar details, personal consultancy, and past life regression, call tel. 8107245, 0920-9818962 or 63. E-mail jaimetlicauco@yahoo.com; visit www.jimmylicauco.com.


Follow Us



Recent Stories:

Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.

  • halakat

    i wish we’ll have our very own james randi to expose this author’s quackery.

    • lolzorzz

      Randi actually challenged Licauco to prove his claims. The latter just denied that he made any.

      Extract from wiki below:

      ‘Randi, inter alia, challenged Licauco to apply for the JREF $ 1 million dollar prize, since the latter claimed that “he has paranormal abilities”. 

      With point-by-point reply…, Licauco forthwith answered Randi’s attacks. Licauco denied having supernatural powers by saying “That’s a lie. I have never claimed to have any paranormal or psychic ability. I don’t know where Randi got that idea”. Although he teaches, among other things, ESP and how to do remote viewing, and even boasted in a show that more than 80% of his students develop the skill.’

      • kismaytami

        Its really funny how one could teach something without mastering it.

      • halakat

        james randi has a “new” documentary, an honest liar, endorsed by popular science figures like neil de grasse, bill nye, among others. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MXOWXSFICOTS2EABQMULUO7UTY Rommel Jason

    If indeed anyone can foretell anything, why wouldnt that guy be at a horse race, winning all the money in the world. Or to be more discreet about it, be an anonymous lotto bettor. If indeed this quack knows anyone psychic, as he seem to deny ever making a claim to such an ability, wouldnt he profit more in training that person (as he is a self proclaimed master of ESP) so that they can win the lotto pot and not have to sweat it out doing seminars?

  • John_Galt_II

    Buhay pa pala tong siraulo na to! 
    Malakas ba ang racket ngayon?



Copyright © 2014, .
To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
Advertisement
Marketplace