Marcos victims may get $10M from buyer of Imelda Marcos’s Monet


In this photo provided by the United States Attorney’s Office in New York shows an an 1881 painting by Impressionist master Claude Monet entitled “L’Eglise et La Seine a Vetheuil.” AP

MANILA, Philippines—Members of the class suit against the estate of the dictator Ferdinand Marcos recently received a “notice of class action settlement” from their lawyer Robert A. Swift through Filipino cocounsel Rodrigo C. Domingo pursuant to an order of the US District Court to the District Court of Hawaii.

The notice informed members that the court would, among other things, decide whether a settlement between the class and the owner of a (Monet) painting formerly belonging to Imelda Marcos was fair, reasonable and adequate.

The court would also decide whether the class counsel’s second interim request for an award of fees and reimbursement of expenses was reasonable. Finally, it would decide whether the request for an incentive award to a class representative was reasonable.

The notice said that in November 2012, the district attorney of New York county unsealed an indictment against Vilma Bautista, former personal assistant to Imelda Marcos, which said that Bautista had sold a valuable French impressionist painting (the Monet) to an unknown buyer without authority from Marcos for $32 million.

Swift immediately filed a lawsuit against Bautista in New York Supreme Court seeking the painting, other art works owned by Marcos and the proceeds from the sale of the painting.

Second suit

As Swift was preparing to file a second lawsuit against others involved in the sale of the painting, discussions took place between himself and the buyer of the painting. In June 2013, the buyer agreed to pay the class suit members $10 million.

The $10 million was deposited in the class settlement fund in the Hawaii Federal Court. Swift said that in exchange for the payment, the class and its members would release the owner from all claims to the painting.

The notification said the Hawaii court will hold a hearing on Oct. 10 and then will consider whether to finally approve the settlement agreement as “fair, reasonable and adequate.”

It will be recalled that in April 1986 a suit was filed against the strongman Marcos on behalf of 9,539 Filipinos, or their heirs, who were tortured, summarily executed or disappeared during Marcos’ rule between September 1972 and February 1986. The estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos was substituted as the defendant upon Marcos’ death in 1989.

The Hawaii Federal Court entered a judgment on Feb. 3, 1995, in favor of the class in the amount of $1.96 billion. But the collection of the amount was hindered by the concealment of assets. For this, the Marcos estate was found in contempt of court. In January 2011 the court entered a judgment of contempt for $353 million.

Swift’s notification said that should the court grant final approval, the settlement of $10 million will be distributed to class members. The lawyer will ask the court to give $1,000 each to eligible class members in 2014.

Related Stories:

Imelda Marcos’ former aide charged in stolen Monet

PCGG to testify in art theft case vs Imelda Marcos’ ex-aide in New York

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • bongarroyo

    abangan niyo sa FB ni BBM at seguradong politically motivated na naman ito. masaya na sana sila doon dahil di kasama sa unang apat sa PBS si BBM kaso ng magdagdag ng dalawa ang COA andoon na kasama si legarda.

    tahimik ulit sila ngayon..LOL


    Si Napoles P10 Billion pesos ninakaw sa kaban ng bayan.Si Imelda Marcos $10 Billion dollar ninakaw sa Pinas tapos nakakalaya pa at naging congresswoman pa ng Ilocos…Huwag sana mag rebolusyon ang mga tao pag gutom na gutom na sila at alam na natin paano pinatay si Muamar Gaddafi ng LIBYA.

  • bryanbrian

    Wala daw ninakaw c marcos???????
    Stupid marcos loyalists

  • 1bravo9

    ewan sa ting mga pilipino nagdudumilat na katotohanan na mandarambong ang mga marcos pero binboto pa rin ..talagang more fun in the philippines kaya walang katapusan ang pagsasamantala ..dapat talaga may makulong sa pandarambong at panloloko sa bayan

  • Pinsan_ni_Mang_Kanor

    sandali, ang painting eh pg aari ng pamahalaan ng pilipinas di ba? bakit ibabayad sa mga marcos victims ang pinagbilhan?

  • duhconsul

    i still don’t get it why a US court is adjudicating this trial? do they really have this kind of jurisdiction over Philippine affairs? or maybe I’m missing something..

    • Mark

      Because the money/properties are in the US.

  • neilabarca

    Mabagal ang gubyerno. Until now, after signing (Noynoy Aquino) a Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act of 2013 last year, wala pa ring nangyayari…

    Sa $10.0 million, umaasa na lang ang mga HUMAN RIGHT VICTIMs sa HUSAY at ABILIDAD ng kanilang abugado.
    Sadyang kupad-pagong ba ang gubyerno sa lahat ng bagay (MRT-LRT, MONORAIL, INFRA at COMPENSATION) ??

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos